Posts
So far, GK's nomination of S'drassa (static link 'cos it'll be archived soon) looks like going through but not without three "no" votes. Let's take a look in, because I feel like it, reverse order.
ModderElGrande stated that S'drassa doesn't have the experience, but that's not the reason. MEG tried to post his own mod on the site, with no discussion and in totally the wrong way. When he started whining about this, it was S'drassa that stepped up and slapped him for it. This led to MEG posting this on S'drassa's talk page and then the official oppose. This oppose, in other words, is motivated by personal dislike.
Next, we see serial annoyance Michaeldsuarez step up. MDS is obviously dedicated to detail. So much that he can't even be bothered to look at S'drassa's user page and so calls him "she or he". MDS is a serial troll, both on UESP and elsewhere, largely caused by his previous rejection from UESP. Another oppose motivated by personal reasons.
Lastly, we have Elliot the Thick. EtT's post is a classic from that user. First, he acknowledges that the rules that let him (EtT) become a patroller are ridiculous, then he says that because of this, S'drassa should be prevented from joining the gang. EtT's entire justification seems to be that because EtT turned out shit with so little experience, everybody else will too.
Well there we have the current state of play. Currently, S'drassa is sailing towards Patrollership with only those three "Oppose" votes. UESPwatch's own opinion is that any user that can even get TGD and RtV on the same side has got to be pretty good.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Special:Contributions/UESPWatch
ReplyDeleteI see that busy vandalizing and getting yourself blocked from ED. I'm unimpressed. You didn't accomplished anything, and I gained more material to write about due to it.
Please try harder next time.
Wasn't me, shit-for-brains. I wouldn't edit your articles if you paid me to do it.
ReplyDeleteDeny it as much as you like; we know the truth ;)
ReplyDeleteThe truth is that your articles are unfunny and full of crap. I dunno who made those edits but at least they were trying to remove the more blatant inaccuracies.
ReplyDeleteIt's a satire, silly. It isn't suppose to be 100% truth.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, why don't you try removing those inaccuracies yourself? You're a funny person; why don't you add your own sense of humor to those articles?
Well somebody already did try to remove the inaccuracies and got bitch-slapped by an admin so I don't think I'll bother thanks. As for improving them, I think the delete button would be the best way to do that.
ReplyDeleteToo bad. You'll never get those articles deleted. Those articles are here to stay.
ReplyDeleteHey Tiber, check the patroller nominations; looks like Elliot admits to being a failure. Oh, and Michael, get a life, at least Tiber writes something people want to read. And your article isn't funny, but I bet you already knew that.
ReplyDeleteGiven his record, Elliot can't exactly deny being a failure.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like S'drassa will be approved despite three bitter little idiots opposing him.
Oh, but it seems there's more to it: all this debate for patroller status. I can't blame S'drassa for trying to stand his ground, but that's a lot of drama for this fairly new editor.
ReplyDelete