Monday 25 January 2010

What does Rawtwat smoke?

This post from Rawtwat the Vicious is yet another attempt to steal the moniker "Thick" from Elliot the Thick. Can anyone understand his point about prostitutes? Anyone? It's supposed to be some kind of crude comparison with ^CEshe^V and The Great Deceiver dating for a while. So is he calling ^CEshe^V a prostitute? Is he accusing TGD of paying for her?? WTF???

This is all part of the latest fight about what users should be allowed to post on the site. More here.

UPDATE: Rpeh gives Ratwar a good spanking. Ratwar realises that it's true he does nothing useful on the site any more so puts in a HUGE amount of effort by... deleting one page marked for speedy deletion... and fixing two spelling mistakes. Wow. Time to take another few months off in case you get RSI, Rawtwat.

UPDATE 2: The only person to support Rawtwat so far is... Elliot the Thick! Not a good sign for Rawtwat.
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

12 comments:

  1. Anarchangel26 January 2010 at 16:58

    Rbleh 'has no idea' what Ratwar is trying to say, but has a lot to say about it nonetheless.

    Update: Despite Ratwar explaining what he meant to say, Rpeh still has no idea, and proceeds to berate Ratwar for the exact opposite of what he meant.

    Interesting that both Septic and Rbleh have no clue what Ratwar meant...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous27 January 2010 at 02:59

    Rpeh continues to insult members. He is a child throwing a tantrum when he doesn't get his way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tiber Septim27 January 2010 at 10:13

    Where does he do that? Details please, Elliot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous27 January 2010 at 13:23

    1. Get over the idea that I am Elliot you dumb fuck. I am not him.

    2. "Incidentally, there are at least two other "couples" on this site, but again I suppose you have to bother editing and reading the site to spot that, something that some editors would be advised to spend more time doing before bestowing their opinions upon the site like a fruitbat expelling the results of a day's digestion"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tiber Septim27 January 2010 at 13:48

    1. Yes you are.

    2. That doesn't insult any named member.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous27 January 2010 at 18:56

    It doesn't matter Rpeh, you are implicitly insulting another member. You need to be warned (again).

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tiber Septim28 January 2010 at 08:39

    You need to look up what "ad hominem" means, Elliot. That's not an ad hom comment so it doesn't break any policies. Now run along, little boy. Let the big boys and girls talk among themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous28 January 2010 at 21:07

    And you aren't?

    ReplyDelete
  9. rpeh28 January 2010 at 22:59

    Elliot, the reason people keep saying the same things about you is that you keep making the same mistakes over and over again. You're incapable of original thought so you regurgitate other what other people say, adding your own special brand of error.

    The only people that think I'm Tiber are useless wasters who should really move on rather than clogging up both the wiki and this blog with the ill-thought-out comments. That's a description that definitely includes you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous28 January 2010 at 23:40

    Wow, way to continue with the crappy behavior, rpeh. Really great defense of your worth right there.

    The "useless wasters" includes your secret little girlfriend too. Did you know?

    ReplyDelete
  11. rpeh29 January 2010 at 09:07

    You don't know who it is. Don't waste my time coming back with "Yes I do", either. You don't.

    This is typical behaviour from you and why I feel fully justified calling you a "useless waster". Instead of doing something useful like improving the wiki, you're wasting your own time here and forcing me to waste mine.

    I know you have no talent of your own, but at least let other people use theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous29 January 2010 at 13:15

    That wasn't me up there. Funny, huh?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)